CryptoCore Wallet
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • How to create Wallet?
  • Roadmap
  • Blockchain
  • Background
    • Related Works
  • Satoshi Plus Consensus
    • Major components, roles, and workflows
    • Proof of Work
    • Delegated Proof of Stake
    • Validator Election
    • Rewards
    • Security
      • Short-Range Attacks
  • Future Explorations
  • Governance
    • DAO
    • Progressive Decentralization
  • Conclusion
  • Glossary
    • References
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Challenges
  • Objectives
  • Decentralization Phases
  1. Governance

Progressive Decentralization

Decentralization is not limited to the consensus level. Governance of the entire CryptoCore Network will progressively decentralize as time passes. At the DAO’s genesis, limits on decentralization will be necessary to get the CRYPTOCORE chain off the ground and establish product-market fit. As the network expands, the Core DAO will increasingly lean on community participation [Wal]. Over time, the broader CRYPTOCORE community will gain control of all governance functions including management of the CRYPTOCORE Treasury.

Challenges

Decentralized governance is very difficult in practice due to various attack vectors [Butb]. Until the chain is mature, DAOs building on top of CryptoCore are at risk of an arbitrary CryptoCore fork overriding their governance. For the CryptoCore DAO to be successful, trust and community building are essential at the beginning of the chain’s lifecycle.

Objectives

Core Network Maintenance objectives at the outset of this project are simple:

  1. Provide a phased path towards decentralization.

  2. Minimize risk to encourage DAOs to form on top of CryptoCore.

Decentralization Phases

Core governance via the CryptoCore DAO will progressively decentralize throughout three stages of development:

  1. Off-chain governance.

    • Pass resolutions with a majority of DAO voters in agreement.

  2. Limited on-chain governance.

    • Allow changing a fixed parameter set (TBD) with onchain coin voting, ex. percentage of burned fees.

    • Likely add time delays to discourage vote buying and similar attacks.

    • Adding / subtracting parameters is at the sole discretion of of the DAO voters, ex. CryptoCore Improvment Proposals (CIP).

  3. Full on-chain governance.

    • Up to the community.

PreviousDAONextConclusion

Last updated 2 years ago